Search
Recent Posts
- ChangingAging.org Redesign -- Please Bookmark!
- Disaster in Buffalo
- Power Up Friday
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Kevin Frick writes...
- Monkhouse Monday
- Getting Closer!
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Power Up Friday
- My Pick for Health and Human Services
- Understanding Health Care Reform
- Facts Are Stubborn Things: Social Security Edition
- Monkhouse Monday
- Localism is Coming
- Krugman Can't Wait...
Recent Comments
- charee on
"If it's unemotional, is it Art?" - mimi on
"If it's unemotional, is it Art?"
Category Archives
- AGING 100
- Aging
- Culture
- Dementia
- Eden Alternative
- Erickson School
- Green House
- Health Policy
- Longevity
- Media
- Rockets
Monthly Archives
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Announcements

Blog Data
« Monkhouse Monday | Main | Brave Sir Robin »
November 3, 2008 |Permalink |Comments (2)
"If it's unemotional, is it Art?"
A Google image search for "unemotional art" turned up this image...
In general, I am willing to believe art "without emotion" can possess aesthetic merit.
Others may disagree.
(H/T EL)
Comments ( 2)
Maybe "unemotional art" can have aesthetic merit, but this piece isn't unemotional. It's clearly a "happy" piece. Warm colors. Curved, relaxed lines. Emotion can be suggested without a representational image.
All the postings I've read, and this is the one I weigh in on:)
Is there such a thing as "unemotional art"? Color, in and of itself, elicits emotion.