Search
Recent Posts
- ChangingAging.org Redesign -- Please Bookmark!
- Disaster in Buffalo
- Power Up Friday
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Kevin Frick writes...
- Monkhouse Monday
- Getting Closer!
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Power Up Friday
- My Pick for Health and Human Services
- Understanding Health Care Reform
- Facts Are Stubborn Things: Social Security Edition
- Monkhouse Monday
- Localism is Coming
- Krugman Can't Wait...
Recent Comments
- CC Andrews on
Blanchard Wins Days: Aging In Community - A McShea on
Blanchard Wins Days: Aging In Community - Joe Podson on
Blanchard Wins Days: Aging In Community
Category Archives
- AGING 100
- Aging
- Culture
- Dementia
- Eden Alternative
- Erickson School
- Green House
- Health Policy
- Longevity
- Media
- Rockets
Monthly Archives
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Announcements

Blog Data
« Chipmunk Economics | Main | I'm Talking Old »
September 24, 2008 |Permalink |Comments (3)
Blanchard Wins Days: Aging In Community
[Editors Note -- This is a guest post from new Changing Aging blogger Janice Blanchard. Janice is a gerontologist and nationally recognized writer, speaker and thought leader on aging issues and we're honored to have her join the Changing Aging family. Her posts will run Wednesdays, or Blanchard Wins Days.]
Most older Americans would prefer to “age in place” – to live in their current homes with supportive services if necessary as an alternative to institutional long-term care. Indeed, people go to extraordinary measures to accomplish this goal. While many consider aging in place suitable, others find it a hollow victory, particularly when it occurs in a home that poses physical, financial or emotional challenges and makes meaningful connection with family, friends, neighbors and the community difficult or impossible. For this and other reasons, an increasing number of people now envision a third way—“aging in community.”
In short, “aging in community” presents a proactive, grassroots model that intentionally creates supportive neighborhoods to enhance well-being and quality of life at home and as an integral part of the community for people of all ages and abilities, particularly elders. Aging in community promotes a deliberate consciousness to be “a darn good neighbor.” Relationships between community members are informal, voluntary and reciprocal, and therefore, sustainable over time. Aging in community promotes social capital - a sense of social trust and interdependence enhanced over time through positive interactions and collaboration in shared interests and pursuits. Elders’ wisdom and experience are recognized and honored and opportunities are promoted to share this with others in the community.
A great example of an aging in community neighborhood, is Generations of Hope in Rantoul, Illinois. The visionary founder, Brenda Krause Eheart, recently won the 2008 Heinz Award for her success in building a “community-based model for adoptive families and senior citizens.” Yesterday, the New York Times featured
an article and slide show of this innovative program.
In the Wins Days to come, I look forward to sharing more about other emerging models of aging in community.
-- Janice Blanchard, MSPH
Based in a shuttered Air Force base in Rantoul, Ill., Generations of Hope matches elderly people to serve as surrogate grandparents for children in foster care. For Irene Bohn, 84, a retired schoolteacher, the role of beloved grandmother to Angelo Laws, 9, and his three siblings, has been the happiest and most important of her life.(Photo: Sally Ryan for The New York Times)
Comments ( 3)
I have believed in NORCs and retirement communities more so than just "aging in place".
I enjoyed this article but could not get the slide show to work. There is an economy of scale in NORCs and communiities that is financially sustainable in todays economy and tsunami growth of folks like me.
But there is neighborhood spirit, pride, relationships (bad and good but stimulating), resources to help and catch someone before that fall too far. They offer a chance for a person to become a leader again, help others, make a diffence, continue to grow and so on then just living in a house.
I had heard about the Rantoul project, its ups and downs of project development, and the driving force of Eheart in making it happen - she certainly deserved the prize. To me, what is appealing about the "aging in community" concept (and, "aging in place" still works for me too, although I appreciate the distinction) is that its philosophy does not rely on big projects but rather can be accomplished by linking what already exists. Any believer in the aging in community concept can go back and change their world, their community, even if it is just a little bit but in the right direction. In discussions of "aging in community" I sometimes hear proponents looking for funding and better governmental coordination and sitting in place waiting for the day the dollars will come from DC, or the state. For now, we can change our worlds. You don't have to wait for permission or a structure or funding to adopt a philosophy. Just do it, and it will change the steps you take. Cheers to Eheart for investing and succeeding in this one big gigantic step in the right direction.
I remember reading about this community several years ago, when it was in the early stages of development and was excited to see such a creative and socially productive use of the property.
I am so, so glad to know that the project has been successful. Intergenerational relationships do so much for all concerned! Elders can benefit from a new sense of involvement and purpose, younger generations have an opportunity to learn from elders and assist them when needed, and children benefit enormously from the relationships they have with elders. This group of foster children has especially critical needs.
Brenda Krause Eheart's vision and tenacity are inspirational. While the property may be unusual, the need for affordable housing and supportive environments is not. I have to believe that this model can be adapted, based on the available "real estate" and socio-economic needs of a community and hope more planned, sustainable, intergenerational communities are the result!