Search
Recent Posts
- ChangingAging.org Redesign -- Please Bookmark!
- Disaster in Buffalo
- Power Up Friday
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Kevin Frick writes...
- Monkhouse Monday
- Getting Closer!
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Power Up Friday
- My Pick for Health and Human Services
- Understanding Health Care Reform
- Facts Are Stubborn Things: Social Security Edition
- Monkhouse Monday
- Localism is Coming
- Krugman Can't Wait...
Recent Comments
- Judith (MAgS) on
Wealth and Age: Notes - steve on
Wealth and Age: Notes
Category Archives
- AGING 100
- Aging
- Culture
- Dementia
- Eden Alternative
- Erickson School
- Green House
- Health Policy
- Longevity
- Media
- Rockets
Monthly Archives
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Announcements

Blog Data
« The Bickersons | Main | Time Goes By Goes Bye Bye »
December 3, 2007 |Permalink |Comments (2)
Wealth and Age: Notes
Dorothea hits the ground running...
I just finished reading the msnbc.com article posted on the 12-2-07 blog comment about preparing for retirement. The website had a calculator where you can plug in certain numbers (some requiring an incredible amount of foresight, i.e., "how long do you project to live?")and calculate the amount of money you need to retire comfortably. Well, I was thinking, what would this same calculator look like if we find the answer to Dr. Bill's question? The universal truth about wealth and aging and retirement? Would the calculator ask you questions like "are you happy today?", "whose life have you touched this year?", "how many new friendships have you made this month?", "were you able to vote this year?". OK, maybe I am getting ahead of myself. But as I read this blog, I feel so excited to be a part of the team who will be searching for these answers and creating a meaning out of them.
I am excited too. The point she makes here is that the "retirement calculator" has a built in and unacknowledged bias. It assumes that the needs of older people can be reduced, in their entirety, to financial needs and that the prudent investor must salt away enough financial capital to meet all of those needs. This is the essence of retirement planning, as it is known today.
Dorothea's hypothesis is that planning for late life should embrace explicit strategies for building both financial and social capital. I think this is very wise.
Of course the people who publish "retirement calculators" make nothing on accrued social capital and, in a bizarre way, suffer when ordinary people (investors) find that they social capital can often function effectively as a replacement for financial capital.
Comments ( 2)
one solution to this challenge is the happiness calculator http://www.saga.co.uk/publicrelations/happinesscalculator.asp
uh, oh - its says that I am not happy . . . funny, I can stop smiling since I have used this thing! It really works!
According to the calculator I'm . . . "on top of the world! Remember that making the most of your social life and leisure time is paramount to a happy and fulfilling life."
Wow, things are better than I thought. Apparently income, marital status and home life have little bearing on happiness. Sweet. Now if only I can get my family members and accountant to agree.