Search
Recent Posts
- ChangingAging.org Redesign -- Please Bookmark!
- Disaster in Buffalo
- Power Up Friday
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Kevin Frick writes...
- Monkhouse Monday
- Getting Closer!
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Power Up Friday
- My Pick for Health and Human Services
- Understanding Health Care Reform
- Facts Are Stubborn Things: Social Security Edition
- Monkhouse Monday
- Localism is Coming
- Krugman Can't Wait...
Recent Comments
Category Archives
- AGING 100
- Aging
- Culture
- Dementia
- Eden Alternative
- Erickson School
- Green House
- Health Policy
- Longevity
- Media
- Rockets
Monthly Archives
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Announcements

Blog Data
« Its the Race We Run-- Not the Destination | Main | *Update* Shame on CMS »
December 5, 2007 |Permalink |Comments (0)
List of Shame
A guest post from UMBC's Kavan Peterson:
In an unprecedented move, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is shining the public spotlight on America's Worst Nursing Homes by publicly releasing a list of 54 facilities with the most serious health and safety problems in the nation. Thanks to The Consumerist for alerting us to this development:
CMS has released the first-ever official list of America's Worst Nursing Homes— a move that leads us to suspect that the Department of Health & Human Services must be getting pretty fed up if they are resorting to public shaming. The list includes the 54 most egregious health and safety violators of the 128 SFF, or "Specialty Focus Facilities," in the U.S.A Special Focus Facility is basically a nursing home that is on double-secret probation— subject to twice as many inspections as a non-SFFs, with the threat of funding cuts for non-compliance.
According to the CMS, the average facility isn't perfect (6-7 violations is the national average.) Those designated as SFFs are guilty of either more violations or more serious violations than usual, as well as a history of fixing problems just long enough to pass inspection, then going right back to business as usual. The CMS dubs this "yo-yo compliance," and the SFF program is designed to deal with it by combining more frequent inspections with more stringent enforcement until the nursing home falls back in line.
If the facility in question doesn't shape up, correct the underlying problems that lead to violations and "graduate" from the SFF program (in about 18-24 months) their funding is cut and they will likely close.
Of course, the first thing I looked for on this list was the names of any nursing homes that cared for loved ones in my family or employed members of my family. To my absolute dismay, I found that the only nursing home in Montana to make this infamous list was none other than Evergreen Missoula Health & Rehab. This facility not only cared for my wife's grandfather during the last months of his life, but it is located on the corner of the street I grew up on and where my parents still live today. I can only hope the public humiliation of making this list will work where government regulations and inspections have not.
Besides sharing this list with as many people as possible, CMS recommends families use its Nursing Home Compare tool to review the ratings of any nursing home they are considering.
For those looking for a ray of hope, go to www.edenalt.org